Loading creative insights…
API:
Qualifying Ads
≥$50 spend + ≥3 RP leads
With ≥1 Est Set
Zero Est Sets
Copy quality signal
Best Cost/Est Set
Lowest in window
Worst Cost/Est Set
Highest in window
Key Findings
Apply a filter to generate insights for the selected window.

Primary Texts — Ranked by Cost Per Estimate Set
How to read: Cost per est set = spend ÷ est sets from this copy. Est Set Rate = est sets ÷ RP leads. Lower cost + higher rate = stronger copy.
#Cost/Est SetEst SetsEst Set RateRP LeadsSpendHook PatternPrimary Text (first 120 chars)
Top Headlines — Cost Per Est Set
Lower = better. ≥2 est sets only.
Headlines — Volume vs Efficiency
Bubble size = est sets. X = cost. Y = est set rate.
All Headlines — Full Ranked Table
#Cost/Est SetEst SetsEst Set RateRP LeadsSpendHeadline
Descriptions — Cost Per Est Set
Short trust anchors. Lower = better.
Descriptions — Est Set Volume
"Local, Loved & Trusted" variants dominate volume.

Hook Pattern Analysis
What opening line type drives the lowest cost per estimate set in the current window
Avg Cost Per Est Set by Hook Type
Derived from top primary texts in current window.
Hook Patterns — At a Glance
Ranked from current window data.

Low-Performing Copy — Current Window
Ads with high lead volume but zero estimate sets, and the highest-cost primary texts in the selected window.

All Qualifying Ads — Leads vs Estimate Sets
Each dot = one ad in selected window. Size ∝ spend. Color = performance tier.
Tier 1: <$200
Tier 2: $200–$400
Tier 3: $400–$700
Failure: >$700 or 0
Top Existing Combinations
Real (primary text + headline + description) triads that ran and produced ≥1 est set in the selected window.
Combos with est sets
Best cost/est set
Best est set rate
Best cost/lead
Sort by:
Cost coloring: █ <$150 · █ $150–$250 · █ $250–$400 · █ $400+
Proposed New Combinations
Untested triads built from the top 5 individual performers across all client accounts. Adapt all primary texts (owner name + city) before use.

How These Are Selected

Top 5 primary texts, headlines, and descriptions are ranked by cost/est set across all client accounts in the selected date window — regardless of which client filter is active. This surfaces the best-performing copy from the entire portfolio. All 125 combinations are generated, existing ones removed, and the top 15 scored by weighted composite.

Composite Score = 1 / (0.50/PT_cost + 0.30/HL_cost + 0.20/DESC_cost)
High Confidence
Medium Confidence
Test
Best projected score
Confidence: █ High = PT and HL both under $250.   █ Medium = one strong element.   █ Test = isolate variable impact.       ⚠️ Adapt owner name + city before use.